Sudhakar Pradhan v. Bbsr Development Authority

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 10277 of 2021 Sudhakar Pradhan .....

Petitioners Mr. A. Mishra, Advocate Vs.

Bhubaneswar Development Authority & Anr.

.....

Opposite parties

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

07.03.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard counsel for the petitioner.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the show cause notice dated 17.11.2020 under Annexure-9 for forfeiture of EMD amount deposited at the time of participation in e-Auction against plot no.73 at Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar and direct the opposite parties to refund his Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) of Rs.5,00,000/- forthwith within a stipulated time.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-12 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time.

5.

Considering the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-12 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

7. The order be communicated to opposite party no.1 at the cost of the petitioner, who undertakes to file requisites within three days.

Alok ...........................

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE .....................................

(SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE