Jaladhar Jena v. Union Of Ind.Andors.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No.16845 of 2012 (Through Hybrid mode) Jaladhar Jena ....

Petitioner Mr. A. Sahoo, Advocate Mr. Susanta Kumar Dash, Advocate -versusUnion of India and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. Chandrakanta Pradhan, Senior Panel Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Order No.

ORDER

26.10.2022 11.

1.

The disposed of writ petition has been listed under heading 'To be Mentioned' at instance of Court.

2.

Mr. Sahoo, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner while Mr. Pradhan, learned advocate, Senior Panel Counsel, for opposite parties.

3.

The listing was on notice of inadvertent typographical errors in judgment dated 18th October, 2022, by which the writ petition was

// 2 // disposed of. In some paragraphs in the judgment, word 'negligence' has been preceded by word 'contributory'.

4.

Word 'contributory', wherever appears in the judgment preceding word 'negligence' be deleted. The corrections be deemed to have been incorporated in said judgment.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge Prasant