Union Of India v. Kamalakant Mishra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPCRL No.985 of 2013 Union of India & others .........

Petitioners Mr. Anindya Kumar Mishra, Adv.

Central Govt. Panel Counsel - Versus - Kamalakant Mishra .........

Opp. Party

CORAM:

JUSTICE C.R. DASH JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

21.02.2022 Order No.

06.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/ Physical Mode).

2.

Heard.

3.

This is a petition filed by the Union of India against an order passed U/S. 145 Cr. P.C. in the year 2013.

4.

Mr. Anindya Kumar Mishra, learned Central Government Panel Counsel submits that, he has no instruction in the matter. 5.

We wonder, how the WPCRL could be filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article- 226 of the Constitution of India against an order passed U/S. 145 Cr. P.C., without taking recourse to regular law under the Criminal Procedure Code.

6.

By efflux of time, the matter must have become infructuous. Accordingly, the WPCRL is dismissed as infructuous. ...............................

C.R. Dash, J.

...............................

Savitri Ratho, J.

Subha