Govinda Sahu v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.8380 Of 2022 (Through hybrid mode) Govinda Sahu ....

Petitioner Mr. S.K. Acharya, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. A.K. Sharma, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Order No.

ORDER

06.04.2022 1.

1.

Mr. Acharya, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, the petition is defective as it does not contain all necessary pleadings and disclosures. He submits, his client, therefore, does not want to prosecute the writ petition and seeks liberty to file afresh.

2.

Mr. Sharma, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State and does not object to the prayer. 3.

The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to file afresh on better pleadings and disclosures.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge Sks