Barun Bayash v. Cmd,Union Bank Indi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 14852 of 2012 Barun Bayash ....

Petitioner Mr. B. Sahoo, Advocate -versusCMD, Union of Bank of India, Mumbai & Others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. S. Satapathy, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

14.09.2022 Order No.

v 07.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Mr. B. Sahoo, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Satpathy, learned counsel appears on behalf of Bank-(Opposite Party Nos.1-5).

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed away in the meanwhile and in spite of communication there is no response from the LRs. 4.

Taking note of such submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of as non-prosecuted giving liberty to the LRs from the petitioner to pursue the matter in the event there is any subsisting cause of action.

(V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi