Santosh Ku.Barad v. Sbi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 1548 of 2013 Santosh Kumar Barad and another ....

Petitioners Mr. Kabiraj Pradhan, Advocate -versusState Bank of India, Bhubaneswar and Others ....

Opp. Parties Mr. S.J. Pradhan, Advocate for the Bank

CORAM:

JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN ORDER (Oral) 14.03.2022 05.

1. This matter is taken up through virtual/physical mode. Order No.

2. Learned counsel for the parties state that the present writ petition challenging the notice dated 04th January, 2013 issued under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 has become infructuous, in the light of the account itself having been closed upon deposit of the agreed amounts towards outstanding liabilities.

3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

(Jaswant Singh) Judge (M. S. Raman) Judge March 14th, 2022 Cuttack AKK