Tulsi Ram Agrawal v. State Of Orissa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 22005 of 2010 Tulsi Ram Agrawal .....

Petitioner Mr. P.K. Nayak, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha .....

Opposite party State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

ORDER

07.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

None Appears for the petitioner at the time of call. 3.

Heard Mr. Y.S.P. Babu, learned Additional Government Advocate.

4.

Perused the record. It appears that the petitioner has filed this writ petition to quash the amendment to Rule-3 of the Rules, 1967 under Annexure-2 series and he further seeks to uphold the earlier amendment as quoted in paragraph-5 of the writ petition. 5.

Since the tender period has already expired, the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

Alok ...........................

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE .....................................

(S.K. PANIGRAHI) JUDGE