Nityanand Manna v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPCRL No.47 of 2021 Nityanand Manna .........

Petitioner Mr. Prasanta Kumar Nayak, Adv.

-VersusState of Odisha & others .......... Opp. Parties Mr. S.S. Kanungo, AGA

CORAM:

JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO

ORDER

22.07.2022 Order No.

08.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/ Physical Mode).

2.

Mr. S.S. Kanungo, learned Addl. Government Advocate appearing for the State has produced a written instruction that he has received from I.I.C., Marine Police Station, Jamboo, DistrictKendrapara. From the said instruction as well as from the statements recorded under Sections 161 of the Cr.P.C. and 164 of the Cr.P.C., it transpires that the victim is a major and she had left the house voluntarily and stayed at Delhi with his relation. During the stay, in Delhi, she was given in marriage and according to her, in presence of her parents. Presently, she is living with her husband, namely Mr. M.R. Mandal at Delhi.

3.

Mr. P.K. Nayak, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has not contradicted any of the above facts, as recorded by us. 4.

In view of this, this proceeding has become infructuous and accordingly, the same is disposed of as infructuous. (S. Talapatra) Judge (M.S. Sahoo) Judge Subhasis