Belamani Goswami v. Bimal Ku.Jena

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

MACA No. 301 of 2020 1.Belamani Goswami 2.Itishree Goswami ....

Appellants Mr. Brundaban Rout, Advocate

Versus

1.Bimal Kumar Jena 2.Manager, Future General Insurance Company Ltd.

....

Respondents Mr. Adam Ali Khan, Advocate (for Respondent No.2)

CORAM:

JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO Order No.

ORDER

12.03.2022 03.

1.

This matter is taken up today in the National Lok Adalat through hybrid mode.

2.

Learned counsels for the Appellants-Claimants and Respondent No.2-Insurance Company are present. The memo in support of the compromise between the parties is kept in the record.

3.

The learned 1st Addl. District Judge-cum-1st MACT, Cuttack had directed the Respondent No.2 to pay an amount of Rs.2,70,000/- (Rupees two lakhs seventy thousand) to the claimants with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the application.

3 It is now agreed by the parties that a further consolidated amount of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees four lakhs only) shall be paid

// 2 // by the insurance company to the claimants-appellants within a period of eight weeks.

4.

It is therefore directed that the Respondent No.2insurance company shall deposit the aforesaid consolidated amount of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees four lakhs only) within a period of eight weeks from today before the Tribunal. The Tribunal shall apportion the amount between the claimants-appellants. 5.

As the settlement is arrived at before the National Lok Adalat, no court fee shall be levied.

6.

The MACA is accordingly disposed of.

7.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(Savitri Ratho) Judge National Lok Adalat Bichi/sukanta