Sarita Behera v. Sanuja Ku.Behera

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CMAPL NO.225 OF 2017 Sarita Behera ....

Petitioner Mr.L.Pradhan, Advocate -versusSanuja Ku. Behera ....

Opposite Party .

CORAM:

JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH

ORDER

24.11.2022 I.A.No.134 of 2017 1.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. There is Order No.03 no appearance on behalf of the contesting opposite party. Considering there is 30 days delay in filing the CMAPL and the grounds become impediment in bringing an application in time, this Court condones the delay in filing CMAPL.

2.

I.A. stands disposed of.

(Biswanath Rath) Judge

ORDER

24.11.2022 CMAPL No.225 of 2017 1.

Considering the reasoning in non-appearance of the counsel Order No.04 for the petitioner on the date the case was posted, the CMAPL stands allowed thereby restoring the TRP(C) No.5 of 2017 to its original position.

// 2 // 2.

CMAPL stands disposed of.

3.

Registry is directed to place the TRP(C) before the assigned Bench.

(Biswanath Rath) Judge sks