Abhaya Kumar Das v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.10993 of 2022 Abhaya Kumar Das ....

Petitioner Mr.R.C.Swain, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr.Y.S.P.Babu, A.G.A.

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA Order No.

ORDER

06.05.2022 01.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate.

3.

The Petitioner has filed the present writ application with the following prayer:

"The Petitioner therefore prays that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ application, after hearing from the Opposite Parties issue notice and further pleased to direct the Opposite Party Nos.3 and 4 to recalculate the share of the Petitioner and company share towards Provident Fund, allow the share with interest to the Petitioner in the deposited money which is deposited before the Opposite PartyNo.4 Office.

And pass any other Order/orders which would give complete relief to the Petitioner keeping in view of the above facts and circumstances of the case."

4.

In course of hearing of the writ application, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has submitted representation before the Managing Director, Odisha Lift Irrigatin Corporation Ltd. Opposite Party No.22 under Annexure-5. It is also

// 2 // submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the said representation is pending without consideration as of now. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation of the Petitioner within a stipulated period of time. 5.

Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that he has no objection if the representation of the Petitioner is considered by the Opposite Party No.2, which is stated to be pending, in accordance with law within a stipulated period of time. 6.

Considering the limited nature of grievance of the Petitioner, the writ application is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the Opposite Party no.2 to consider the representation of the Petitioner in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The Opposite Party No.2 shall do well to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-5 by passing a speaking and reasoned order. The decision so taken on the representations of the Petitioner, shall be communicated to the Petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter.

7.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ application stands disposed of.

8.

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

RKS ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge