Minakshi Padhy v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 11235 of 2022 Minakshi Padhy .....

Petitioner Mr. A. Dash, Advocate Vs.

Union of India & Another .....

Opposite Parties Central Government Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

ORDER

27.07.2022 Order No.

01.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Mr. A. Dash, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner.

3.

The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking to quash the order of demand Notice dated 13.04.2022 vide Annexure-3 and issue direction to Opposite Party No.2 not to issue fresh advertisement and allow her to continue till end of the tender period.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the Petitioner has made representation to Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-4 series and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection. 5.

Considering the contentions raised by learned Counsel for the Parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the

merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-4 series, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules Alok/Banita (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (S.K. MISHRA) JUDGE