Saktiprasanna Sahoo v. Dg And Ig Of Police, Cuttack

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.11375 of 2022 Saktiprasanna Sahoo ....

Petitioner -versusDG and IG of Police, Cuttack & Others ....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

18.05.2022 1.

1.This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. Order No

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(i) to admit the writ petition and calling upon the Opp.Parties to show cause as to why the impugned order of charge memo dated 10.06.2016, punishment dtd. 21.10.19 and enquiry report dated 06.02.2019 under Annexure-1j, 9 & 6 respectively shall not be quashed and as to why the financial benefits hike increment and salaries shall not be paid to the petitioner on the event of quashing of the aforesaid impugned order".

4.

He further submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation on 13.12.2019 at Annexure-10 to the Writ Petition before the opposite party No.1 but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to opposite party no.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.

// 2 //

5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs opposite party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioners.

6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat