Chhayakanta Sahoo v. Kabita Senapati

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMC No. 4118 of 2015 Chhayakanta Sahoo and others ....

Petitioners Mr. Suvashish Pattnaik, Advocate -VersusKabita Senapati ....

Opposite Party Mr. R.P. Kar, Advocate

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK

ORDER

18.11.2022 Order No.

11.

1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party.

2.

It is informed to the court that petitioner No.1 has expired in the meantime.

3.

In view of the above submission, the case as against him is abated.

4.

Mr. Pattnaik, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in so far as the monetary relief and compensation so claimed by the opposite party, the same is not maintainable. 5.

Mr. Kar, learned counsel for the opposite party submits that as regard the other reliefs under Sections 19 and 20 of D.V. Act, the learned court below is to consider the same 6.

Considering the above submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties, the CRLMC stands disposed of with a liberty

granted to the petitioners to raise all such grounds as are available to them under law before the learned S.D.J.M., Bhubaneswar in CRLMC No.136 of 2015 and on being so moved, the court below shall consider the same and pass appropriate order as per and in accordance with law.

7.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge U.K.Sahoo