Tikina Sahoo v. Chhabindranath Nayak

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

MACA No.772 of 2013 Tikina Sahoo ....

Appellant Mr. B.N. Samantaray, Advocate -versusChhabindranath Nayak and Another .... Respondents Mr. R.C. Sahoo, counsel for Respondent No.2

CORAM:

JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

12.09.2022 Order No.

Misc. Case No.1415 of 2013 & MACA No.772 of 2013 07.

1. The matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2. Heard Mr. B.N. Samantaray, learned counsel for the Appellant and Mr. R.C. Sahoo, learned counsel for insurer - Respondent No.2.

3. There is delay of 483 days in preferring the appeal. The grounds mentioned in the petition are not found satisfactory and reveals casual approach of the Appellant. Accordingly this court is not inclined to condone the limitation.

4. The prayer for condoning the delay is rejected.

5. Resultantly, the appeal is dismissed on the ground of limitation.

6. In view of dismissal of the appeal no order requires to be passed in the pending Misc. Cases./ I.A.

( B.P. Routray) Judge M.K. Panda