Prasanta Padal @ Padalu v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No.4198 of 2022 Prasanta Padal @ Padalu ....

Petitioner Mr. D.K.Sahoo, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and another ....

Opposite Party Mr. P. Tripathy, Addl. Standing Counsel

CORAM:

JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

ORDER

21.10.2022.

Order No.

01.

1. This matter is taken up through virtual mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.

3. Considering the nature of accusations and the existence of materials prima facie in support thereof and particularly the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., which is prima facie corroborated by the medical examination report, I am not inclined to allow the prayer for bail, which is therefore rejected. It is open to the Petitioner to renew his prayer after examination of the victim during trial. (Sashikanta Mishra) AKB Judge

// 2 //