Jammi Gopamma v. Rushikulya Gramya B

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 20156 of 2011 Jammi Gopamma ....

Petitioner Mr. Prasanna Kumar Mishra, Advocate -versusRushikulya Gramya Bank, Uppalada Branch, DistGajapati and another ....

Opp. Parties Mr. Paramananda Mishra, Advocate for the Bank

CORAM:

JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN Order No.

ORDER (Oral) 10.03.2022 04.

1. This matter is taken up through virtual/physical mode.

2. The defaulting borrower is praying for a direction to the Rushikulya Gramya Bank (O.P.1) for settling the outstanding liability under the account declared NPA by way of an OTS.

3. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Bank states that the account of the petitioner stands closed in view of an amicable settlement and thus the present writ petition has become infructuous.

// 2 //

4. In the light of the statement of the learned counsel for the Bank at the Bar, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

(Jaswant Singh) Judge (M.S. Raman) Judge March 10th, 2022 Cuttack Basudev