Madhu Sudan Mahar v. L.I.C Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 22333 of 2011 Madhu Sudan Mahar ....

Petitioner Mr. S.J. Pradhan, Advocate -versusL.I.C. of India and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Panda, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

26.07.2022 Order No.

03.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called. 3.

Mr. S.P. Panda learned counsel appears on behalf of the LIC. 4.

The present writ petition has filed being aggrieved by the nonselection of the petitioner to attend the interview for the post of peon in the LIC of India pursuant to the letter of the Executive Director (personnel) dated 20th May, 2011 at Annexure-1. 5.

Learned counsel for the Opposite Party-LIC has filed a memo along with death certificate indicating therein that the petitioner has died on 19.02.2015 which be kept on record.

6.

With the efflux of time and death of the petitioner, the cause of action has rendered infructuous.

7.

In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.

(V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi