Papu Mallik v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.5661 of 2022 Papu Malik and twelve others ....

Petitioners Mr. J. Kamila, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opposite Party Ms. Samapika Mishra, A.S.C.

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA Order No.

ORDER

13.06.2022 01.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.

3.

This is an application under Section 438, Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner for anticipatory bail.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. While the husband of the informant had gone to collect money, the present petitioners entered into the house of the informant and assaulted the son of the informant.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there was political rivalry between the parties during panchayat election in order to take revenge the present case has been foisted against the petitioners. 6.

Considering the nature of allegation, gravity of offence and the fact of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the

// 2 // petitioners. However, it is directed that in the event the petitioners surrender before the learned J.M.F.C., Soro in C.T. Case No.299 of 2022, arising out of Soro P.S. Case No.130 of 2022 within a period of two weeks from today, they shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as the learned Magistrate may deem just and proper including the condition that the petitioners shall furnishing cash security of Rs.3,000/- (rupees three thousand) each. 7.

Accordingly, the ABLAPL is disposed of.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

( A.K. Mohapatra ) Vacation Judge Jagabandhu