Cesc Ltd. v. Commissionher Orf Customs (Preventive)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
OTAPL No.17 of 2018 CESU Limited ....
Appellant Mr. S. P. Sarangi, Advocate -versusThe Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Bhubaneswar and another ....
Respondents Mr. Avinash Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel for CGST, CX and Customs
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN Order No.
ORDER
20.12.2022 I. A. No.27 of 2018 and OTAPL No.17 of 2018 03.
The Appellant had been unable to pay the deficit Court fees of Rs.188/- for over four years. Even, the explanation offered for condonation of delay of 91 days in filing the OTAPL is not satisfactory. The Court does not propose to grant any further indulgence. Accordingly, the OTAPL and IA are dismissed. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M. S. Raman) Judge M. Panda