Ajay Ku.Nayak v. State And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 22217 of 2011 Ajay Ku. Nayak ....

Petitioner None -versusState and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

19.10.2022 Order No.

05.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

None appears for the petitioner when the matter is called. 3.

Mr. A.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2Corpporation is present when the matter is called. 4.

The present Writ Application has been filed for regularization with consequential benefits in the post of S.A.-cum-G.A./Junior GradeIII. 5.

The Opposite Parties have filed a counter referring to judgment passed by this Court dated 30.08.2005 in W.P.(C) No.10342 of 2004 wherein the petitioners reversion to the post of Kantawalla from the post of S.A.-cum-G.A. was upheld and in W.P.(C) No.10342 of 2004 and it is stated at the bar that such order of this Court as attained finality. 6.

In view of the same, the grievance of the petitioner in the present Writ Petition does not merit consideration and accordingly Writ Petition stands rejected.

(V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi