Bijoy Kumar Oram v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.12982 of 2022 Bijoy Kumar Oram ....

Petitioner Mr. A. Tripathy, Advocate.

-versusState of Odisha & others ....

Opp. Parties Mr. A.R. Dash, Additional Government Advocate.

CORAM:

JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO Order No.

ORDER

23.06.2022 1.

1.

Heard Mr. Arabinda Tripathy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.R. Dash, learned Additional Government Advocate.

2.

According to Mr. Tripathy, the petitioner, who has got the compensation for the acquisition of his land and house, is aggrieved by inaction of the opposite parties, more particularly the Tahasildar-cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Hemagiri (opposite party no.3), in including his name in the list of displaced persons, for getting the benefits under the Orissa Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy, 2006. During course of hearing, he submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to approach the Collector, Sundargarh (opposite party No.2) by filing a representation for redressal of his grievances and the said opposite party be directed to take a decision on such motion within a specific time period. 3.

Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to file a comprehensive representation before the Collector, Sundargarh (opposite

// 2 // party No.2) through Registered Post within a period of two weeks from today. In the event, such a representation is filed along with a copy of this order, the opposite party No.2 is directed to take a decision on the same in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.

4.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. 5.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(Biswajit Mohanty) Judge amit (Savitri Ratho) Judge