M/S.Techno India v. Dy.Dir.Revenueesi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No.16245 of 2011 (Through Hybrid mode) M/s Techno India Ltd.

....

Petitioner -versusDy. Director (Revenue), ESI and another ....

Opposite Parties Mr. P. P. Ray, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA

ORDER

01.12.2022 Order No.

04.

1.

None appears on behalf of petitioner.

2.

Mr. Ray, learned advocate appears on behalf of the authority. Same situation prevailed on 2nd November, 2022. Text of order made that date is reproduced below.

"1.

None appears on behalf of petitioner.

2.

Mr. Ray, learned advocate appears on behalf of revenue.

3.

The writ petition is of year 2011. In event petitioner continues to go unrepresented on adjourned date or thereafter, the writ petition is likely to be dismissed. 4.

List on 9th November, 2022."

3.

The writ petition is dismissed.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge Prasant