Pinku Naik v. State Of Odisha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.5979 of 2022
1. Pinku Naik
2. Pratap Naik @ Pradeep Naik
3. Naresh Naik
4. Niranjan Naik @ Chagala Naik
5. Tripur Naik @ Tihilu Naik
6. Dhaneswar Naik Petitioners ....
Mr.A.S. Paul, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....
Opp. Party Mrs. Susamarani Sahoo, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO Order No.
ORDER
22.06.2022 01.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Learned counsel for the State has produced the injury report of one Gundicha Sahu which indicates that he has sustained simple injury. The injury report is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C.
// 2 // for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with G.R. Case No.416 of 2022 arising out of Colliery P.S. Case No.81 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Talcher for alleged commission of offences under sections 147/148/452/ 323/506/149 of the Indian Penal Code.
Perused the first information report annexed to the anticipatory bail application.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the offences are triable by Magistrate and taking into account the nature of accusation against the petitioners and the nature of injury sustained by the injured and on hearing the learned counsel for the State, I am inclined to release the petitioners on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioners in connection with the aforesaid case, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that they shall make themselves available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court
// 3 // or to the Investigating Officer.
Violation of any of the above conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.
The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
( S.K. Sahoo) Judge RKM