Minati Biswal v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P. (C) No. 498 of 2016 Minati Biswal .....

Petitioner Mr. S. K. Samal, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha and others .....

Opposite Parties Mr. A.K. Mishra, AGA & Mr. P.K. Mohanty, Senior Advocate (for OPSC)

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

ORDER

10.08.2022 Order W.P.(C) Nos. 498, 366, 1218 and 2905 of 2016, W.P.(C) Nos. 12140, 12529, 09.

23090, 23569 of 2015 These matters are taken up through hybrid mode. 2.

In compliance to the order dated 25.07.2022 and 01.08.2022, Mr. P.K. Mohanty, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the OPSC produced the necessary instruction in sealed cover. The said sealed cover document is opened and it is found that none of the Petitioners was qualified in the examination and the reason for such disqualification has also been stated in the said order. The Report be kept on record.The entire report is quoted herein below:- Detail information in W.P(C) No. 498 / 2016, W.P(C) No. 2905 of 2016, W.P.(C) No. 12140, 12529, 23090, 23569 of 2015 and W.P.(C) No. 366 and 1218 of 2016 in pursuance of order of Hon'ble High Court dt. 25-07-2022 in connection with recruitment to the Odisha Civil Services Examination-2011, pursuant to Advt. No. 05 of 2011-12. Sl Writ Petitioner W.P.(C).

Name of the Petitioners Roll Nos.

of Petitioners Preliminary Examination Marks secured Remarks (whether qualified of unqualified) candidates qualified vide OPSC Notice No.

1839/PSC, Dt.

01.05.2014 candidates subsequently found qualified as per orders dated 16.01.2015 passed W.P(C) 6601/2014 vide OPSC Notice 5562/PSC,Dt.08.12.2015 Mains Viva Voc Test Total Marks (Main + V.V.

Test) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

The petitioner is not qualified as she has already failed to qualify OCS Preliminary Exam.

Which mandatory in nature as per OCS Recruitment Rule W.P.(C).

498/2016 Ms.

Minati Biswal,SEBC (F) Qualified in Perilimianry held on 19.01.014 Not qualified as per orders dt. 18.06.2015 of the Hon'ble Tribunal in OA No. 2146(C) /2014 (Priyambada Das) and other two cases 315632 (Subsequently found disqualified on application of new criterion laid down by the OAT vide order dated 18.06.2015 in OA 2146(C)/2014) 110 (Not selected for V.V. Test as per orders passed OA No.2146(C)/2014.

But as per court order petitioner was allowed to appear the V.V.Test) W.P(C) 2905/2016 Shri Ajay Kumar Rout, Qualified in Perilimianry held on 19.01.014 Qualified Prelim.

Exam. As per the orders of the Tribunal passed in OA No. 2146(C)/2014 (Priyambada Das) ----- 400231 Not Qualified qualifying subject's i.e 'English" and 'Odia"

OCS Main Exam.

70 (Not selected for V.V. Test as per orders passed OA No.2146(C)/2014.

But as per court order petitioner was allowed to appear the V.V.Test Not Qualified in Main Language Subject's i.e.

'English'

and 'Odia'

W.P.(C) 23090/2015 Anasuya Beura Qualified in Perilimianry held on 19.01.014 ----- Not qualified in Prlim.

Exam. As pr orders dt.

18.06.2015 of Hon'ble Tribunal in OA 2146(C)/2014 (Priyambada Das) and other two cases.

301434 Not Qualified qualifying subject's i.e 'English" and 'Odia"

OCS Main Exam.

80 (Not selected for V.V. Test as per orders passed OA No.2146(C)/2014.

But as per court order petitioner was allowed to appear the V.V.Test Not Qualified in Main Language Subject's i.e.

'English'

and 'Odia'

The petitioner is not qualified as she has already failed to qualify OCS Preliminary Exam.

Which mandatory in nature as per OCS Recruitment Rule W.P.(C) 23569/2015 Krushna Chandra Sahu,SEBC (M) Qualified in Perilimianry held on 19.01.014 Not qualified in Prlim.

Exam. As pr orders dt.

18.06.2015 of Hon'ble Tribunal in OA 2146(C)/2014 (Priyambada Das) and other two cases.

312636 (Subsequently found disqualified on application of new criterion laid down by the OAT vide order dated 18.06.2015 in OA 2146(C)/2014) 160 (Not selected for V.V. Test as per orders passed OA No.2146(C)/2014.

But as per court order petitioner was allowed to appear the V.V.Test The petitioner is not qualified as she has already failed to qualify OCS Preliminary Exam.

Which mandatory in nature as per OCS Recruitment Rule W.P.(C) 366/2016 Satyabrata Dash, GEN (M) Qualified in Perilimianry held on 19.01.014 Not qualified in Prlim.

Exam. As pr orders dt.

18.06.2015 of Hon'ble Tribunal in OA 2146(C)/2014 (Priyambada Das) and other two cases.

326416 (Subsequently found disqualified on application of new criterion laid down by the OAT vide order dated 18.06.2015 in OA 2146(C)/2014) 140 (Not selected for V.V. Test as per orders passed OA No.2146(C)/2014.

But as per court order petitioner was allowed to appear the V.V.Test W.P.(C) Jyotirekha Parhi GEN Qualified in Perilimianry Not qualified in Prlim.

Exam. As pr orders dt.

18.06.2015 of The petitioner is not qualified 102032 (Subsequently found disqualified 70 (Not selected for V.V. Test as per orders passed OA

as she has already failed to qualify OCS Preliminary Exam.

Which mandatory in nature as per OCS Recruitment Rule N.B:- 1.

The Civil Services Examination is conducted in three stages, the object of which is to secure best and the most suitable persons for the job, avoiding patronage and favoritism.

2.

The Preliminary examination is a qualifying in nature while Written (Main) Examination is to access the candidates' knowledge and intellectual ability.

3.

The interviews/viva voce test is conducted to access the candidates overall intellectual and personal quality. The object of conducting the examination in three stages is to eliminate less meritorious candidates.

1218/2016 (M) held on 19.01.014 Hon'ble Tribunal in OA 2146(C)/2014 (Priyambada Das) and other two cases.

on application of new criterion laid down by the OAT vide order dated 18.06.2015 in OA 2146(C)/2014) No.2146(C)/2014.

But as per court order petitioner was allowed to appear the V.V.Test In view of the above position, these Writ Petitions merit no consideration and the same stand dismissed accordingly.

Arun/Padma (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (S.K. MISHRA) JUDGE