B.Abakash v. Hemant Sharm

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CONTC No.1075 of 2018 B. Abakash .... Petitioner Ms. Sucheta Gumansingh, Proxy Counsel on behalf of Ms. Pami Rath, Advocate -versusHemant Sharm .... Contemnor/ Opp. Party Mr. Manoj Kumar Khuntia, Additional Government Advocate

CORAM:

JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN ORDER (Oral) 29.06.2022 04.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid Order No.

arrangement (virtual/physical mode).

2.

Mr. Khuntia states that the order dated 29th June, 2017 passed in W.P.(C) No.2907 of 2014 stands duly complied with by the Government while passing a speaking order dated 30th July, 2018, which was duly endorsed to the petitioner. A copy of the order has been supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner at the time of hearing. He further states that the said 09(nine) vacancies have since been filled up in the subsequent recruitment.

// 2 // 3.

In view of the above, we find no grounds to pursue the present contempt.

4.

The CONTC is disposed of as infructuous.

(Jaswant Singh) Judge (M. S. Raman) Judge AKK 29th June, 2022 Cuttack