M/S Kings Of Wine,Cuttack v. Chief Manager-Cum-Ao, Canara Bank, Bbsr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.13846 of 2022 M/s. Kings of Wine, Cuttack and another ....
Petitioners Mr. Arun Kumar Patra, Advocate -versusChief Manager -cumAuthorised Officer, Canara Bank, Bhubaneswar and another ....
Opp. Parties Mr. B.N. Udgata, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order No.
ORDER
10.06.2022 01.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the Bank.
The petitioners M/s. Kings of Wine, Cuttack through its proprietor Bijay Kumar Rout and one Smt. Soma Das have filed this writ petition challenging the eauction sale notice dated 16.05.2022 issued by opposite party no.1 to hold e-auction in respect of secured asset/mortgage property of petitioner no.2 under Annexure-5.
Mr. B.N. Udgata, learned counsel for the opposite party-Bank on instruction submitted that the
// 2 // outstanding loan dues against the petitioners as on date is to the tune of Rs.16,20,000/- (rupees sixteen lakhs twenty thousand).
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are ready and willing to deposit 25% (twenty five) percent of the outstanding dues and file an application for One Time Settlement/settlement of the loan dues before the opposite party no.1 and necessary order may be passed to consider the said application for One Time Settlement/settlement of the loan dues giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, without entering into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that if the petitioners deposit 25% (twenty five) percent of the outstanding dues and simultaneously files an application for One Time Settlement/settlement of the loan dues within a period of two weeks from today before the opposite party no.1, the same shall be considered in accordance with law by giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioners within a further period of two weeks and the decision taken thereon shall be communicated to the petitioners in writing. It is made clear that in the event the petitioners fail to deposit the amount as directed within the time stipulated, the opposite party-Bank is at liberty to take steps against the petitioners in accordance with law. Till
// 3 // consideration of such application for One Time Settlement/settlement of the loan dues, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. However, the process of auction shall continue but no final decision shall be taken till disposal of the said application.
Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.
(S.K. Sahoo) Vacation Judge (M.S. Raman) Vacation Judge I.A. No.7354 of 2022 02.
In view of the order passed today in W.P.(C) No.13846 of 2022, this I.A. is also disposed of. (S.K. Sahoo) Vacation Judge (M.S. Raman) Vacation Judge RKM