Tankadhar Naik v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.13848 OF 2022 Tankadhar Naik .....

Petitioner Dr. N. Swain, Advocate Vs.

State of Odisha & Ors.

.....

Opposite parties State Counsel (O.Ps.1-3) Mr. S.K. Patra, Advocate (O.P.4)

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

07.12.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to opposite parties no.1 & 2 to recommend the case of the petitioner to opposite party no.4 to disburse the final pension along with consequential benefits with penal interest @ 9% on the calculated entitlements within a stipulated period.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.2 vide Annexure10 and the same may be directed to be considered and disposed of taking into consideration Annexures-4 & 6 within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has raised no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-10 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law taking into consideration Annexures-4 & 6 within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE