← Library
Orissa High CourtABLAPL/6570/2022allowed

Susila Badi v. State Of Odisha

2022-07-06Mr. Justice S.K.Sahoo3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.6570 of 2022

1. Susila Badi

2. Baren Badi

3. Kuni Prusty @ Urmila Prusty

4. Sridhar Prusty ....

Petitioners Mr. S.S. Satyadarshi, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opp. Party Mr. Rajesh Tripathy, Addl. Standing Counsel

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO Order No.

ORDER

06.07.2022 01.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with C.T. Case No.292 of 2022 arising out of Balasore Sadar P.S. Case No.97 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Balasore for alleged commission of offences under sections 498A/323/307/294/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with section 4 of the D.P. Act.

// 2 // Perused the first information report annexed to the anticipatory bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioner no.1 is the mother-in-law, petitioner no.2 is the younger brother-in-law, petitioner no.3 is the sisterin-law of the informant and petitioner no.4 is the husband of petitioner no.3 and the husband of the informant has already been taken into custody and released on bail and the case arises out of a matrimonial dispute and on hearing the learned counsel for the State, I am inclined to release the petitioners on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioners in connection with the aforesaid case, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that they shall make themselves available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Investigating Officer. Violation of any of the above conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

// 3 // The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge RKM