Niranjan Sahoo @ Muna Sahoo v. State Of Odisha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.6829 of 2022
1. Niranjan Sahoo @ Muna Sahoo
2. Tuni Sahoo @ Twinkil Sahoo
3. Lalita Barik @ Thuruka Barik @ Lalit Barik ....
Petitioners Mr. A. Mohanty, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....
Opp. Party Mr. Arupananda Das, Addl. Government Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO Order No.
ORDER
13.07.2022 01.
This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
This is an application under section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Sukinda P.S. Case No.102 of 2022 corresponding to C.T. Case No.234 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned Gramyanayalaya, Sukinda for alleged commission of offences under sections 341/323/307/294/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
// 2 // Perused the F.I.R.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner no.1 is the brother-in-law of informant Manasi Sahoo and there was civil dispute between the parties and it is a case and counter case and there are no such materials against the petitioners so as to attract the ingredients of the offence under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and the petitioner no.2 is a lady and therefore, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioners may be favourably considered.
Learned counsel for the State has produced the case diary and submitted that the injured in this case are Manasi Sahoo and Narayan Sahoo and both of them have sustained simple injuries.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, the relationship between the parties and the nature of injury sustained by the injured, I am inclined to release the petitioners on anticipatory bail and accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioners in connection with the aforesaid case, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer with further conditions that they shall make themselves
// 3 // available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and they shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Investigating Officer.
Violation of any of the above conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.
The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
( S.K. Sahoo) Judge RKM