Tukuna Nahak v. State Of Orissa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 9390 of 2016 Tukuna Nahak .....

Petitioner M/s. Deepali Mohapatra, Advocate Vs.

State of Orissa and others .....

Opposite parties State Counsel & Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate (O.P.2)

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

28.02.2022 Order No.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that by efflux of time the prayer made in this writ petition has become infructuous. Mr. S.K. Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 also states that by efflux of time, the impugned order has reached its finality.

3.

In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.

Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (V. NARASINGH) JUDGE