Raghunath Acharya v. State Of Orissa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTACK

W.P.(C ) No.14814 of 2022 Raghunath Acharya ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Others ....

Opp. Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

18.7.2022

1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. Order No

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following prayer:- " Why the Opposite parties will not be directed to grant pension as due and admissible in favour of the petitioner w.e.f May, 2020 as provided under OCS (Pension) Rule 1992 within a stipulated time; and (II) Why the Opposite Parties will not be directed to sanction the gratuity as due and admissible in favour of the petitioner along with interest within a stipulated time and (iii) Why the opposite parties will not be directed to sanction and disburse the arrear pension as due and admissible on such sanction of regular pension within a stipulated time and (iv) Why the Opposite Parties will not be directed to sanction and release the financial benefit as due and admissible for the period from 1.3.2009 to 1.1.010 within a stipulated time."

4.

The Petitioner has moved before Opposite Party No.5 seeking redressal of his grievances as

// 2 // made in the representation under Annexure-5 to the Writ Petition.

5.

Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No.5 to take a decision on the above noted representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and communicate the result thereof to the Petitioner.

6.

With the aforesaid observation and direction the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge sangita