← Library
Orissa High CourtWP(C)/15087/2022disposed off

Prafulla Kumar Sahu v. State Of Odisha

2022-07-19Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.15087 of 2022 Prafulla Kumar Sahu ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Ors.

....

Opposite Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

19.07.2022

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement Order No (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the Petitioner is permitted to make correction in the first page of the brief in Court today.

3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

4. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- " Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it si therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus by directing the opp. Parties to bring the petitioner to regular establishment with retrospective effect.

And further be pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to disburse regular salary f the Petitioner w.e.f. 1.3.2009 to 30.9.2009 and also regularize the service roll of the petitioner for the said period.

And further be pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to disburse the pension and pensionary benefit in favour of the

// 2 // petitioner as per OCS Pension Rule 1992 as has been granted to similar circumstance person.

And pass any other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper;

And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray."

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation on 27.05.2022 at Annexure-9 to the Writ Petition before the O.P. No.1, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays that a direction be issued to Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.

5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioner.

6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha