Banamali Kujur v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.15370 of 2022 Banamali Kujur ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Ors.

.... Opposite Parties COROM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

20.07.2022

01. 1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

Order No 2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.

3.

The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition with the following prayer:- "(i) It is therefore humbly prays that your Lordships would be graciously pleased to admit this writ application, call for the records and after hearing the parties allow the same with cost and issue a writ / writs in the nature of certiorari/ mandamus and also issue any other or further writ / direction commanding the Opp. Parties / Authorities particularly O.P. No.3 to grant / sanction / release the MACP benefits in favour of the petitioner after completion of his 10/20/30 years of service i.e.

2nd MACP w.e.f.

01.06.2004 and 3rd MACP w.e.f. 01.06.2014 fixing the grade pay of Rs.5,400/- in favour of the petitioner and to fix the petitioner's pay in Level-* Cell 24 at Rs.57,500/- in the pay matrix of ORSP Rule, 2017 in view of the judgment dated 27.06.2016 passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP(C) No.2831/2016 in the case of State of Odisha and Others vs.

Biharilal Barik and Others under Annexure-3 and further release all arrear

// 2 // financial benefits in favour of the petitioner within a stipulated time".

4.

Considering the submission made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the Opposite Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three weeks hence.

5.

It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the Opposite Party No.3 shall do well to dispose of the representation within a period of two months. The decision so taken by the Opposite Party No.3 be communicated to the Petitioner within that time. 6.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat