← Library
Orissa High CourtWP(C)/15409/2022disposed off

Ranjita Behera v. State Of Odisha

2022-07-08Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.15409 of 2022 Ranjita Behera ....

Petitioner Mr.Kunja Sundar Das, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr.P.C.Das, A.G.A.

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA Order No.

ORDER

08.07.2022 01.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.

3.

The present writ application has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayer:

" Therefore, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct the Opp.Parties more specially Opp.Party Nos. 3 & 4 to allow the benefits under 2nd Revised Assured Carrier Progression Scheme (RACP) under Annexure-2 in favour of the Petitioner immediately from the date of Notification vide Notification No.9769 dated 08.06.2015 with all arrear dues.

Or, any other order/orders, direction/directions may be passed by this Hon'ble Court, in favour of the Petitioner." 4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that ventilating her grievance, the Petitioner has filed a detailed representation before the Collector, Mayurbhanj, Opposite Party No.3 on 21.02.2022 under Annexure-5. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the said representation is

// 2 // pending without consideration as of now. He also submits that a direction may be given to the Opposite Party No.3 to consider the representation of the Petitioner within a stipulated time. 5.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that he has no objection if the representation of the Petitioners is considered by the Opposite Party No.3, which is stated to be pending, within a stipulated period of time in accordance with law.

6.

Considering the limited nature of grievance of the Petitioner, the writ application is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the Opposite Party no.3 to consider the representation of the Petitioner in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The Opposite Party No.3 shall do well to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner taking into consideration Annexures-2 & 3 by passing a speaking and reasoned order. The decision so taken on the representation of the Petitioner, shall be communicated to the Petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter. 7.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ application stands disposed of.

8.

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

RKS ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge