Pradyumna Panigrahi v. Gyan Das

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CONTC No.1145 of 2019 Pradyumna Panigrahi & Others ....

Petitioners Mr. Ajit Chandra Mahapatra, Advocate -versusGyan Das, I.A.S, Collector & District Magistrate, Bhadrak ....

Contemnor/ Opposite Party G.R. Mohapatra, A.S.C (for State)

CORAM:

JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH JUSTICE M. S. SAHOO ORDER (Oral) 07.02.2022

2. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. Order No

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners.

3. Learned counsel for the Contemnor/Opposite Party submits that the order dated 29th January, 2019 passed in W.P.(C) No.710 of 2019 has been duly complied with in as much as that after giving opportunity of hearing to the Petitioners, an order dated 9th August, 2019 was passed by the Collector, Bhadrak. The same was supplemented by another order dated 5th February, 2021 passed by Collector, Bhadrak, whereby the Gochar land over which the construction was made, was dereserved being in excess of sanctioned reservation and thereby legalizing the construction made for the Revenue Department.

4. In view of the above, the Contempt Proceeding is dropped. (Jaswant Singh) Judge ( M. S. Sahoo) Judge February 7th, 2022 Cuttack.

sangita