Bishnu Naik v. State Of Orissa

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

RVWPET No. 103 of 2017 Bishnu Naik and Others ....

Petitioners Mr. Sameer Ku. Das, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and Others ...

Opp.Parties Mr. B.A. Prusty, Addl. Standing Counsel (S & ME Dept.) Mr. S.C. Dash, Advocate (for O.P. Nos. 5 to 15)

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN

ORDER

19.12.2022 Order No.

I.A. No. 332 of 2022 10.

1. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed. Consequently, the order dated 1st November, 2022 passed in the present review petition is recalled and the review petition is restored to file.

2. The application is disposed of.

RVWPET NO.103 OF 2017

3. Learned counsel appearing for the original writ Petitioner admits before the Court that the review Petitioners ought to have been heard in the main writ petition and that they were left out by mistake. He admits that the review Petitioners were in fact

interveners before the Tribunal and when the order of the Tribunal was challenged by the present writ Petitioners, they made a mistake by not impleading the present Petitioners as Opposite Parties.

4. In view of the above statements, the Court reviews the order dated 1st September, 2016 and restores the writ petition i.e. W.P.(C) No.11218 of 2015 to file.

5. The RVWPET is disposed of in the above terms. The writ petition be listed before the roster Bench on 6th February, 2023. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M.S. Raman) Judge S.K. Jena/Secy.