Dr.Satya Narayan Bhujabala v. Veer Surendra Sai Institute Of Medical Science And Research
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) Nos. 16290, 16876, 16215 and 16308 of 2022 In W.P.(C) No. 16290 of 2022 Dr. Satya Narayan Bhujabala & Anr.
....
Petitioner Ms. Pami Rath, Adv.
-versusVeer Surendra Sai Institute of Medical Science and Research, Burla and Ors.
....
Opposite Parties Mr. D. Mund, AGA In W.P.(C) No. 16215 of 2022 Dr. Swaraj Sambit Samal ....
Petitioner Mr. Deba Ranjan Mohapatra, Adv.
-versusState of Odisha and Ors.
....
Opposite Parties Mr. D. Mund, AGA In W.P.(C) No.16308 of 2022 Sarmistha Subhadarsini ....
Petitioner Mr. Jagabandhu Sahu, Adv -versusState of Odisha and Ors.
....
Opposite Parties Mr. D. Mund, AGA
// 2 // In W.P.(C) No. No. 16876 of 2022 Dr. Jyoti Pradhan & Anr.
....
Petitioners Ms. Pami Rath, Adv.
-versusVeer Surendra Sai Institute of Medical Science and Research, Burla and Ors.
....
Opposite Parties Mr. D. Mund, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI Order No.
ORDER
02.08.2022 4.
1. All the matters are taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned counsel for the parties are present. Judgment prepared in separate sheets is delivered and pronounced in open Court in the presence of learned counsel for the parties and the order is passed accordingly as follows:-
3. Similar sentiment has been echoed in University Grants Commission v. Neha Anil Bobde1, wherein it was held that in academic matters, unless there is a clear violation of statutory provisions, the regulations or the notification issued, the Courts shall keep their hands off.
4. In light of the above-mentioned facts and precedents cited hereinabove, this Court is not inclined to allow the petition of the petitioners. All the Writ Petitions tagged 1 (2013) 10 SCC 519
// 3 // along with the present Writ Petition are hereby dismissed.
5. Interim orders passed earlier in W.P.(C) Nos.16290, 16215 and 16308 of 2022 stand vacated.
(Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge BJ