Suru Naik v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.7974 of 2022 Suru Naik & Others ....

Petitioners Mr. Lalit Sahu, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opposite Party Mr. P.C. Das, A.S.C.

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K.MOHAPATRA

ORDER

04.08.2022 Order No.

01.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.

3.

This is an application under Section 438, Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioners for anticipatory bail, involving offence punishable under Sections 324/326/307/506/34, I.P.C.

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that there is no criminal antecedent against the present petitioners. Further, on verification of the injury report, learned counsel for the State submits that the injuries are simple in nature.

5.

Considering the aforesaid facts and submission, nature of allegation and gravity of the offence, although I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioners, however it is observed that, in the event the Petitioners surrender before the learned S.D.J.M.,

// 2 // Balangir in G.R. Case No.936 of 2022 corresponding to Puintala P.S. Case No.141 of 2022 within a period of three weeks from today, the Petitioners shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as the learned Magistrate may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, but subject to verification of criminal antecedents of the Petitioners. If it is found that there is more than one criminal antecedent against the Petitioners, then this bail order shall stand automatically revoked.

6.

The ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly.

7.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules. (A.K. Mohapatra) Judge S.K.Parida