Prasant Ku.Pujapanda v. Bmc,Bhubaneswar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 15815 of 2016 Prasant Kumar Pujapanda .....

Petitioners Mr. A.C. Panda, Advocate Vs.

Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation, Bhubaneswar & Others .....

Opposite parties Mr. B. Dah, Advocate (O.P. Nos.1 & 2)

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

27.04.2022 Order No.

04.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Mr. A.C. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner states that in the meantime the work has already been over and, therefore, by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous. So far as the final bill and refund of EMD is concerned, the petitioner may be granted liberty to pursue his remedy before the appropriate forum in terms of the DTCN/agreement itself.

3.

In view of the above submission, the writ petition stands disposed of with the liberty aforesaid.

Ashok/Sukanta (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE