Shibananda Sahoo v. Oat,Cuttack Bench

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P (C) No. 10486 of 2016 Shibananda Sahoo & Anr.

.....

Petitioners Mr. D.R. Mohapatra, Advocate Vs.

OAT, Cuttack Bench & Ors.

.....

Opposite Parties Mr. S.N. Nayak, ASC

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

11.04.2022 Order No.

4.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions in the matter at this moment. Therefore, the writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned, if any cause of action still survives.

3.

With liberty aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. Ashok/Puspa (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (SAVITRI RATHO) JUDGE