Santosh Ranjan @ Santosh Panigrahi v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.8309 of 2022 Santosh Ranjan @ Santosh Panigrahi ....

Petitioner Mr. Santosh Ku. Mahanty, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opp.Party Mr.S.Patra, A.S.C.

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA Order No.

ORDER

27.07.2022 0`.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Mr.S.K.Mohapatra, learned counsel files Vakalatnama in Court on behalf of the informant.

3.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Standing Counsel. Perused the records. 4.

This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioner for anticipatory bail.

5.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitoner is innocent and no way connected with the alleged crime. The Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 6.

Considering the nature of allegations made, gravity of the offence and the fact of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner. However, it is directed that in the event the Petitioner surrenders before the learned S.D.J.M.,

// 2 // Berhampur in G.R.Case No.1054 of 2022 arising out of Berhampur Mahila P.S.Case No.77 of 2022 within a period of three weeks from today and moves for bail, he shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as would be deemed just and proper by the learned Magistrate with further condition that the Petitioner shall not threaten, influence or terrorise the informant and his family members in any manner whatsoever and in the event it is found that if any of the conditions is violated, then this order shall stand revoked. 7.

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

8.

Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge RKS