Lalbihari Tarenia v. Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

RVWPET No.160 of 2022 (Through hybrid mode) Lalbihari Tarenia and others ....

Review Petitioners Mr. Subir Palit, Senior Advocate -versusUnion of India and others ....

Opposite Parties Mr. A.K. Sharma, AGA Mr. C.K. Pradhan, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Order No.

ORDER

05.08.2022 1.

1.

Mr. Palit, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of review applicant, who were petitioners in the writ petition, disposed of by order dated 5th January, 2022. He submits, his clients seek review of said order and thereby recall because an amendment was not brought to notice of Court inspite of due diligence.

2.

Mr. Pradhan, learned advocate appears on behalf of Archeological Survey of India (ASI). He submits, Writ Appeal

// 2 // no.81 of 2022 has been preferred by applicants and it is pending. Mr. Sharma, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State and submits, that is so. 3.

In view of appeal preferred by applicants and same pending, this Court is not inclined to entertain the review application.

4.

It is dismissed.

(Arindam Sinha) Judge Sks