Sangram Jena v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.8693 of 2022 Sangram Jena ....

Petitioner Mr. Arun Kumar Das, Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opp.Party Mr.M.K.Mohanty, A.S.C.

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA Order No.

ORDER

01.08.2022 01.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Standing Counsel. Perused the records. 3.

This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioner for anticipatory bail.

4.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the allegations made in the F.I.R. are false and fabricated and concocted one. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the informant at no point of time has been asked for further dowry, rather all the family members of the Petitioner are tortured by her rude behavior.

5.

Considering the nature of allegations made, gravity of the offence and the fact of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner. However, it is directed that in the

// 2 // event the Petitioner surrenders before the learned S.D.J.M., Dhenkanal in G.R.Case No.1323 of 2021 arising out of Sadar P.S.Case No.579 of 2021 within a period of three weeks from today and moves for bail, he shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as would be deemed just and proper by the learned Magistrate with further condition that the Petitioner shall not threatened influence, terrorirse and harass the informant and her family members while on bail. In the event it is found that the Petitioner is involved in such activities, this order shall stand revoked.

6.

The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

7.

Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge RKS