Chhita Maharana v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No. 6927 of 2022 Chhita Maharana ....

Petitioner M/s. B. Manasingh, Advocate -versusState of Odisha and another ....

Opposite Parties Mr. Karunakar Gaya, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH

ORDER

10.08.2022 I.A. No. of 2022 Order No.

01.

1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

3.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the meanwhile he has filed an I.A. for change of nomenclature. 4.

Taking into account the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the recitals in the I.A., the prayer sought for in the I.A. for change of nomenclature is allowed. 5.

The I.A. stands disposed of.

6.

Registry is requested to change the nomenclature of this bail application and register it as CRLA.

7.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is called upon to serve a copy of the newly numbered CRLA on the learned counsel for the State.

(V. NARASINGH) Judge Santoshi