Pradip Kumar Tandy v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTACK

W.P.(C)No.16410 of 2022 Sunil Kumar Ghosh ....

Petitioner -versusState of Odisha & Others ....

Opp. Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

ORDER

08.08.2022

02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. Order No

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following prayer:- "Opposite Parties be directed for payment of the differential arrear wages of the Petitioner from the year of 01.05.1993 to 31.12.2015 as per the calculation sheet vie Annexure-6 within a specific time period and may pass such other orders/orders, direction/directions as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper."

4.

The Petitioner has moved before Opposite Party No.4 seeking redressal of his grievances as made in the representation under Annexure-6 to the Writ Petition.

5.

Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs Opposite Party No.4 to take a decision on the above noted representation of the petitioner, in accordance

// 2 // with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and communicate the result thereof to the Petitioner.

6.

With the aforesaid observation and direction the Writ Petition is disposed of.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge sangita