Puspalata Patnaik v. Prasanta Ku.Behera

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

MACA No.1105 of 2017 Puspalata Patnaik and Another ....

Appellants Mr. Anup Kumar Jena, Advocate -versusPrasanta Kumar Behera and Others ....

Respondents Mr. Adam Ali Khan, counsel for Respondent No.2 Mr. S.K. Bhanjdeo, counsel for Respondents 3 & 4

CORAM:

SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

10.01.2022 Order No.

Misc. Case No.1690 of 2017 & MACA No.1105 of 2017 07.

1.

The matter is taken up through video conferencing mode. 2.

Heard Mr. A.K. Jena, learned counsel for the Appellants, Mr. A.A. Khan, learned counsel for Respondent No.2 and Mr. S.K. Bhanjdeo, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. 3.

The grounds mentioned in the petition to condone the delay are found unsatisfactory.

4.

The Misc. Case is dismissed.

5.

Resultantly the appeal is dismissed on the ground of limitation.

6.

Copy of this order be uploaded in the High Court's Official Website as per Court's Notice No.514 dated 7th January, 2022. ( B.P. Routray) Judge M.K.Panda