Mariyam Tigga v. Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

FAO No.300 of 2022 Mariyam Tigga ....

Appellant Mr. Satyaban Sahoo, Advocate -versus- ....

Union of India represented through its General Manager, East Coast Railway, Bhubaneswar and Another Respondents Mr. Sanjib Swain, Sr. Panel Counsel for Railways

CORAM:

SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

13.10.2022 Order No.

03.

1.

The matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Mr. S. Sahoo, learned counsel for the Appellant and Mr. S. Swain, learned senior panel counsel for Railways. 3.

It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that challenge in the present appeal is against the direction of keeping 90% of the compensation amount in fixed deposit and is covered by a similar judgment of this court.

4.

It is admitted by both parties that the challenge in the present appeal is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in FAO No.262 of 2020 and batch, disposed of on 9th September, 2021. 5.

Accordingly, present appeal is disposed of in terms of the principles decided in said decision of this Court with a direction to disburse entire compensation amount in favour of the claimant by

keeping 50% of the same in his name in fixed deposit in any Nationalized bank for a period of five years. 6.

With the aforesaid observation and direction the FAO is disposed of.

7.

An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules. ( B.P. Routray) Judge M.K.Panda