Rahul Verma @ Rahul Dev Verma v. State Of Odisha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

ABLAPL No.9156 of 2022 Rahul Verma @ Rahul Dev Verma ....

Petitioner Mr.Soumya Ranjan Das,Advocate -versusState of Odisha ....

Opp. Party Mr.M.K.Mohanty,A.S.C.

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA Order No.

ORDER

05.09.2022 02.

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

On oral prayer of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, he is permitted to carry out the correction in court. 3.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Standing Counsel. Perused the records. 4.

This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioner for anticipatory bail.

5.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner being the husband is unnecessarily dragged into these litigations due to certain misunderstanding with his wife. 6.

Considering the nature of allegations made, gravity of the offence and the facts of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner. However, it is directed that in the

// 2 // event the Petitioner surrenders before the learned J.M.F.C. Rural, Rourkela in G.R.Case No.646 of 2021 arising out of Brahmanitarang P.S.Case No.177 of 2021 within a period of three weeks from today and moves for bail, he shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as would be deemed just and proper by the learned Magistrate with further conditions that the Petitioner while on bail shall not threaten, influence, terrorise or harass the informant and her family members in any manner whatsoever. It is also directed that the Petitioner shall also look after the well being of the informant and shall provide maintenance to the informant so long as the matrimonial dispute subsists.

7.

Accordingly, the ABLAPL is disposed of.

8.

Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge RKS