Sk.Matlub Ali v. Manmath Pattnaik

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLREV No.352 of 2022 S.K. Matlub Ali ....

Petitioner Ms. D. Sukla, Advocate -versus1. Manmath Pattnaik

2. Mahesh Kumar Modi

3. Ajay Kumar Mallick ....

Opp. Parties Mr. Sanjay Kumar Das, Advocate for opposite party no.1

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO Order No.

ORDER

11.10.2022 02.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party no.1.

In this revision petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 26.07.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Case No.17 of 2022 by the learned Executive Magistrate, Tangi-Choudwar. In the impugned order, the learned Tahasildar, Tangi-Choudwar directed the D.A. in-charge of Demarcation to fix up a suitable date for demarcation of the scheduled land at the cost of 1st Party Member

// 2 // under intimation to the R.I. concerned as well as the boundary tenants and local police.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Das, learned counsel for the opposite party no.1 filed documents i.e. the order sheet of Demarcation Case No.58 of 2022 which indicates that after receipt of the extract of the order dated 26.07.2022 of the Tahasildar, Tangi-Choudwar, the demarcation proceeding was initiated and the Amin was directed to demarcate the land and the Amin after demarcation has submitted the report and accordingly, the Demarcation Case is closed and the report of the Amin has also been annexed to the order sheet.

In view of the documents filed, since the impugned order has already been carried out, this revision petition has become infructuous.

The CRLREV is accordingly disposed of.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge RKM